The article that follows is a textbook example of conclusion-driven “scholarship” which operates independently of the facts and in disregard of any relevant theoretical guidelines. Anthropology can play a role in sorting out a crime scene where homicide is suspected to have been committed, but it plays no role at all in “proving genocide.” The finding of genocide depends on the intent of the perpetrators and status of the victims, not on any information about the crime scene that anthropology could possibly provide.
The role of forensic anthropology in proving genocide
Source: https://diginole.lib.fsu.edu/islandora/object/fsu:183025/datastream/PDF/view