Prof. Milenko Kreća’s view of the Genocide convention and its applicability in the Bosnia v. Serbia ICJ litigation

Dr. Milenko Kreća is professor of international law at the University of Belgrade and was a judge on the International Court of Justice panel which considered Bosnia and Herzegovina’s application to ICJ to find Serbia guilty of genocide for certain events which took place on its territory during the conflict in the 1990s. Kreća’s separate and…

Prof. Michael Mandel: The ICTY Calls It ‘Genocide’

Late Prof. Michael Mandel’s classical deconstruction  of ICTY’s genocide argument as articulated in the Krstić judgement. The analysis is applicable to subsequent ICTY Srebrenica “genocide” judgements as well. On August 2, 2001, Trial Chamber I of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) ruled that the events at Srebrenica in July 1995 constituted…

George Szamuely: Defining Genocide Down – The Case of Srebrenica

Srebrenica is the main business of the Hague Tribunal and establishing genocide in Srebrenica is the court’s principal political task. Prof. George Szamuely closely examines the Tribunal’s questionable legal rationale used in arguing its Srebrenica genocide case. Genocide, which had not featured at Nuremburg, is the pride and glory of the U.N. tribunals. The International…

Milošević and genocide: Transcript of Dr Cees Wiebes and Chris Stephen interviewed by Clive Anderson on Radio 5 Live, October 2004

When in early 2000s the Dutch government decided to appoint a commission to investigate what happened in Srebrenica, Dr Cees Wiebes was engaged to research the intelligence background of the subject events. The commission’s comprehensive conclusions were about 7,000 pages long. The final document is known as the NIOD Report, and was published in 2002.…