George Szamuely: Defining Genocide Down – The Case of Srebrenica

Srebrenica is the main business of the Hague Tribunal and establishing genocide in Srebrenica is the court’s principal political task. Prof. George Szamuely closely examines the Tribunal’s questionable legal rationale used in arguing its Srebrenica genocide case. Genocide, which had not featured at Nuremburg, is the pride and glory of the U.N. tribunals. The International…

The Sham of the Hague Teibunal: The ICTYʼs Rules of Evidence

The Balkan Conflicts Research Team is continuously producing superb, hard-hitting and intellectually provocative Twitters about Srebrenica and the Hague Tribunal. We highly recommend them to our readers who may follow them by visiting their Twitter account at: Balkan Conflicts Research Team@ResearchTeam What are ‘Rules of Evidenceʼ? The principles applied to the admission of the various kinds of evidence…

The Sham of the Hague Tribunal: The ICTY and the silence of the lambs

The Balkan Conflicts Research Team is continuously producing superb, hard-hitting and intellectually provocative Twitters about Srebrenica and the Hague Tribunal. We highly recommend them to our readers who may follow them by visiting their Twitter account at: Balkan Conflicts Research Team@ResearchTeam You may view this Tweet at:  https://twitter.com/ResearchTeam/status/1268827074883706880?s=20 Has the Hague Tribunal been properly monitored and supervised by the…

The Sham of the Hague Tribunal: The ICTY’s profound ignorance

The Balkan Conflicts Research Team is continuously producing superb, hard-hitting and intellectually provocative Twitters about Srebrenica and the Hague Tribunal. We highly recommend them to our readers who may follow them by visiting their Twitter account at: Balkan Conflicts Research Team@ResearchTeam You may view this Tweet at: https://twitter.com/ResearchTeam/status/1266282068658360323?s=20 How thorough was the ICTY’s research on the Balkan Conflicts? Woefully…

Jonathan Rooper on the Srebrenica cover-up

The “Srebrenica cover-up” story was improvised to explain the embarrassing dearth of bodies of execution victims that became manifest shortly after exhumations began. As late as the Krstić trial judgment in 2001, even the Prosecution friendly Chamber was forced to admit that no satisfactory evidence of a Srebrenica cover-up, involving the massive reburial of bodies…

The sham of the Hague Tribunal: The ICTY & the Srebrenica ‘cover-up’

The Balkan Conflicts Research Team is continuously producing superb, hard-hitting and intellectually provocative Twitters about Srebrenica and the Hague Tribunal. We highly recommend them to our readers who may follow them by visiting their Twitter account at: Balkan Conflicts Research Team@ResearchTeam You may view this Tweet at:   https://twitter.com/ResearchTeam/status/1261199650750636035?s=20 What was the Srebrenica cover-up? A story that began to…

Milošević and genocide: Transcript of Dr Cees Wiebes and Chris Stephen interviewed by Clive Anderson on Radio 5 Live, October 2004

When in early 2000s the Dutch government decided to appoint a commission to investigate what happened in Srebrenica, Dr Cees Wiebes was engaged to research the intelligence background of the subject events. The commission’s comprehensive conclusions were about 7,000 pages long. The final document is known as the NIOD Report, and was published in 2002.…

The Sham of the Hague Tribunal: The ICTY & the UN

The Balkan Conflicts Research Team is continuously producing superb, hard-hitting and intellectually provocative Twitters about Srebrenica and the Hague Tribunal. We highly recommend them to our readers who may follow them by visiting their Twitter account at: Balkan Conflicts Research Team@ResearchTeam You may view this Tweet at:  https://twitter.com/ResearchTeam/status/1258668705560608768?s=20 What is the relationship between The Hague Tribunal and the UN?…